Winnisquam Regional School District
Professional Development Plan
Approved by School Board 10/06
PURPOSE
Under
the federal law No Child Left Behind,
educators are publicly accountable for improving student performance.
At the same time the diversity of learners in the classroom presents
greater challenges to meet all students’ learning needs.
If all students
are to have a chance for success, they must have teachers who know how to teach
every student to a high standard. To
do this, teachers need more support to meet the learning needs of all students
and they need the tools to meet the higher expectations.
Teaching to high standards requires teachers to teach in ways that
differentiates the instruction for all students.
Differentiating instruction means that teachers utilize different
instructional strategies, lessons, and materials for students that may be in the
same classroom. To plan
differentiated lessons, a teacher must assess students’ strengths and
weaknesses, have time to analyze the assessment and plan lessons as well as
orchestrate classroom management for the pacing, transition and flow of
different work assignments for meeting all students learning needs.
Like students, teachers must be actively involved in learning and must
have opportunities to discuss, reflect upon, try out and use better
instructional approaches to meet accountability measures that increase each
year.
One
of the important components of improving student performance is through teacher
professional development. Setting
high standards for what students need to know and be able to do when they
complete their education takes place through the quality of our teachers.
Ongoing professional learning and development to meet the needs of all
students is a moral imperative for all educators.
Students come to school with differences in learning styles and
backgrounds. To make connections
both emotionally and instructionally to all students, teachers must also be
lifelong learners to meet the diverse learning needs of every student, every day
and each year. Professional
development enhances teacher quality through attitudes that reflect professional
values, and personal commitment, professional knowledge and understanding of
content and connecting content to students’ learning processes and
professional skills and abilities to actively engaging students as independent
learners.
The
purpose of the Professional Development Master Plan is to guide the
Philosophy
The
focus of Professional Development is to improve student learning and increase
the educational staff’s effectiveness, knowledge, and skill based on the best
research and exemplary practices. Having a district-wide philosophy of
professional development provides a “compelling
picture of the future that inspires commitment” to student learning (Regional
Educational Laboratory, 2000).
If all educational staff are to successfully
teach all students high standards, everyone who affects student learning must be
learning at all times. Therefore,
in teaching and learning for continuous improvement, having a philosophy that
aligns with goals that are tied with continuous staff learning will enhance
staff knowledge and leadership capacity. As
in any other profession, research indicates that the most effective staff
development includes what
·
Continuous
learning, not one time seminars
·
Focus
on improving classroom practice and increasing student achievement
·
Activities
that are embedded in the daily work of teaching
·
Activities
centered on crucial teaching and learning activities- planning lessons,
evaluating student work and developing curriculum
·
Activities
that cultivated in a culture of collegial support that involves sharing
knowledge and experience in the same student improvement objectives
·
Activities
which are supported by modeling and coaching that teaches problem-solving
techniques
The
district’s plan also enhances what our teachers are already doing in creating
a learning community focused on and resulting in improved student performance
through:
·
Content
knowledge
·
Student
assessment
·
Knowledge
of student development
·
Use
of data
·
Classroom
management
·
Differentiated
Instructional lessons
·
Effective
teaching strategies and techniques
Supporting
the District and School Improvement Plans
The
·
Focus
on improving student learning and reducing the gap between actual and desired
levels of student achievement
·
Reflection
on teaching, investigating ideas on best practices and question how particular
practices work with students
·
Development
and evaluation of curriculum, instructional activities, and student assessment
according to research and standards
·
Organized
time for teachers and principals to reflect, dialogue and plan
·
Data
driven decisions made by analyzing student work
Data
Driven Decision Making
The
District is focusing on a data-driven decision-making model to improve student
learning and this will include a link to professional development.
The District’s Data and Assessment Committee will look for trends in
student learning and help to direct the district in making changes. Student data
can be easily accessed through the MMS software program and NWEA’s
Map testing program. Data from NECAP and NHEIAP tests are used as well to direct
the areas of growth that the district as a whole address to improving student
learning. The NWEA program connects student growth to DesCartes
which defines each student’s instructional level and the skills needed to move
to the next level. The skill levels
listed are directly tied to the New Hampshire Grade Level Expectations (grades
2-8) and Grade Span Expectations (grades 9-12).
Teachers individually will review student data.
Grade level teams and schools will also review data to determine how best
to increase student achievement. The following are research-based strategies
proven to increase student achievement that will be a focus of district:
·
Writing
Across the Curriculum
·
Assessment
Driven Teaching
·
Building
Vocabulary Skills
·
Instructional
Alignment
·
Scope
and Sequence of District Curriculum
·
Gap
Instructional Strategies
·
District-wide
Sampling Portfolio Assessments
·
Differentiated
Instruction
·
Bloom’s
Taxonomy and Howard Gardner
·
Building
Rigor in All Areas of the Curriculum
All
of these are directly related to the DINI, SINI and Strategic plan. They also
reflect the effective development research on different schools around the U.S.
Department of Education’s National Awards.
When teachers have time to analyze data and student work samples, they
are able to analyze data and student work samples,
they are able to identify student learning outcomes, instructional practices and
research-based strategies that most efficiently and effectively produce learning
results. The
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND FUNCTION
Composition
The
Professional Development Master Plan Committee shall be comprised of
representatives of the following: the school board, administrators, teachers,
special educators, specialists, paraprofessionals, and the community. The number
of the representatives on the committee will be as follows:
Teachers from WRHS/WRMS
2
Teachers from USS/SS/SCS
3
Building Principals
2
Special Educators
2
Paraprofessionals
2
District Administrator
1
School Board Member
1
Parent/Community Member
2
Function
The
Professional Development Master Plan Committee develops, implements, and
evaluates the local master plan. The
responsibilities of the committee shall be to:
·
Review Data from
the various sources of Standardized and Non-standardized Assessments to measure
the effectiveness of the Professional Development Master Plan in improving
student learning
·
Design and
recommend policy to the school board
·
Review and
update the Professional Development Master Plan
·
Address the
district’s in-service needs
·
Provide and
evaluate professional growth activities
·
Share needs
assessment information with the superintendent of schools
·
Evaluate the
function of the system
·
Hear appeals
from staff
·
Aid educators in
the re-certification process
Goal
Setting
The
Winnisquam Staff Development Plan is a three-tiered
approach. All decisions about staff
development are data driven at each level:
·
District level
staff development is an ongoing, long-term plan to increase the effectiveness of
employees through interventions aimed at achieving district identified goals.
·
Building level
development is a one to three year plan at the school or department level to
achieve identified building goals. Building
and department goals will relate to district goals yet be flexible in adapting
to the desired direction of the site administration and staff.
·
Individual level
development is a three-year, formal and informal plan for activities, which meet
individual needs aligned with district direction.
In
the planning stages of the process, the committee realizes that one size does
not fit all when it comes to professional development. Within this process the
following questions must be addressed:
·
What are the
students learning needs?
·
How can the
educator meet the needs of students to have them successfully achieve or exceed
state standards?
·
How can the
educator assess skills efficiently and effectively?
·
What tools does
the educator need to accomplish student learning?
·
What
professional development is needed to help educators?
All
teachers must have equal access to quality professional development.
This development should meet the teachers varied backgrounds, needs and
own learning styles. They should
promote a supportive culture which helps to build professional communities,
promote collaboration, experimentation and challenging discourse between all
members of the educational community. It
is equally important to promote the development of leaders who will take
responsibility for promoting programs and strategies linked to school
improvement and support other professionals as they move forward.
Individual
Professional Development Master Plan goals should be fully aligned with the
DATA
COLLECTION AND INTERPRETATION
Identification
of Local Student Learning Needs
Student
needs on the local level are identified through the use of the New England
Common Assessment Program (NECAP), NWEA MAP, Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT),Scholastic
Aptitude Test (SAT), and Advanced Placement Examinations (AP). A variety of
non-standardized methods such as daily observation of student progress,
portfolios, report cards, and midterm and final examinations are also used.
Collection,
analysis, and dissemination of data
The
responsibility and process of determining the link between student performance
and professional growth will become embedded in the educational setting by
collecting and analyzing the following data. The results will be used to
implement necessary instructional and curricular changes.
|
Type
of Assessment |
Collection
and Analysis of Data |
|
NECAP |
Building
administrator will disseminate testing results to all K
through 12 grade teachers. These teachers will then meet as a group to
identify strengths and weaknesses in curriculum and teaching pedagogy
based on student achievement on the exam. Curriculum modifications and
instructional strategies will be discussed to address identified
weaknesses. |
|
NWEA
MAP |
Building
administrators will look at the data to identify strengths and
weaknesses in the curriculum and teaching pedagogy based on student
achievement on the exam. Teachers
in grades 1-12 will access student data and address student learning
needs. Curriculum modifications and instructional strategies will be
discussed. |
|
PSAT,
SAT and AP |
Teachers
of high school level courses: Building administrator will disseminate
testing results to all teachers of high school level
courses. These teachers will then meet as a group to identify strengths
and weaknesses in curriculum and teaching pedagogy
based on student achievement on these exams. Curriculum modifications
and instructional strategies will be discussed to address identified
weaknesses. |
Non-Standardized
Measurements
|
Type
of Assessment |
Collection
and Analysis |
|
Daily
Observation of Student Progress |
Classroom
Teachers make and direct paraprofessionals to incorporate daily
modification of learning strategies to meet the learning styles and
needs of the students within the classroom |
|
Report
Cards |
By
grade level, Classroom Teachers and Building Administrators: Review
individual student’s grades and compare them to standardized testing
results identifying any discrepancies and possible strategies to
re-mediate the discrepancies. |
|
Mid
Terms and Finals And
End of Course Assessments |
By
Department, Classroom Teachers and Building Administrators: Compare
individual classroom results and relate them to curriculum goals and
instructional strategies. Identify any changes in instructional
strategies to be implemented in future courses. |
The
abovementioned professionals within each category will meet to discuss the
results of the analysis of the data and how it relates to mastering GLEs
and GSEs. At
the district level this takes place three times a year following NWEA testing
and NECAP and it ongoing at the building level. If
changes need to be made in curriculum, all stakeholders will be present during
the analysis phase and changes can take place immediately. If the data suggests
that professional development opportunities are needed, each group should direct
suggestions to their building Professional Development representative to report
to the committee to assess the overall effectiveness of the Professional
Development Master Plan in improving student learning.
DEVELOPING
INDIVIDUAL STAFF DEVELOPMENT PLANS
The
|
Action |
Timeline |
Date
Completed |
|
Supervisors
review staff development plan procedures |
2nd
week in August |
|
|
Training
for staff development plan held for new teachers |
August-Pre-Service
Orientation |
|
|
Supervisors
verify new staff have approved Form A on
record prior to approving any professional development activities.
Returning staff evaluations and plans should be completed at the
end of previous school year. |
No
later than October 1st. No
later than July 1st |
|
|
Supervisors
meet with individual staff members to review/revise plans if
necessary. |
As
per evaluation schedule |
|
|
Supervisors
will meet with staff members to review their own evaluation of plan at
the end of the three year cycle and present evidence of growth as
related to student learning outcome data. |
No
later than June 30th in year of renewal |
|
Summary
of Re-Certification Requirements
Professional
Staff
The
State Board of Education mandates that each school district in
After
a person receives initial certification, s/he must accumulate at least 75 CEU’s
(defined as 1 clock hour per CEU) hours of professional growth every three (3)
years.
The
situations described below highlight the differences in requirements for
1
Endorsement Area x 30 hours of subject knowledge = 30 CEU’s
Other
areas
45 CEU’s
TOTAL
75 CEU’s
Situation
Two: A staff member
with two endorsements needs 105 CEU’s with 30
hours in each field of specialization for which he/she is certified (e.g.
30 hours in English and 30 hours in learning disabilities). The remaining
45 hours can be earned in component areas 2 through 7.
2
Endorsement Areas x 30 hours of subject knowledge = 60 CEU’s
Other
Areas
=
45 CEU’s
TOTAL 105 CEU’s
Situation
Three: A staff
member with three endorsements needs 135 CEU’s
with 30 CEU’s in each field of specialization for
which he/she is certified. The remaining 45 hours can be earned in component areas
2 through 7.
3
Endorsement Areas x 30 hours of each area of certification
= 90 CEUs
Other
Areas
= 45
CEUs
TOTAL 135
CEUs
For
each additional endorsement, a staff member must earn an additional 30 CEU to
keep current and re-certified every three years.
Situation
Four:
A paraprofessional must earn 50 CEU’s during a
three year cycle.
Paraprofessional
Staff
Under
present law the only paraeducators who must be
certified in
Ed
512.06 Certified Paraprofessionals.
Requirements for
certified paraprofessionals shall be as follows:
(a)
For those certified paraprofessionals who are employed by a unit listed in Ed
512.01 a minimum of 50 CEUs shall be required in
areas determined by the professional development master plan required by this
part; and
(b)
For those certified paraprofessionals who are not employed by a unit listed in
Ed 512.01 a minimum of 50 CEUs of paraprofessional
growth shall be required in one or more of the 7 components listed in Ed
512.02(g).
DEVELOPING
YOUR PLAN
The
following 5 phases will provide structure for the educator to frame his/her
individual professional development goals over a one to three year period.
Phase
I: Understanding the content in my district, school, and self
Phase
II: Writing your individual professional development goals
Phase
III: Implementing the plan
Phase
IV: Documenting the plan: Professional Development Portfolio
Phase
V: Reflection and Presentation of the Plan
PHASE
I: UNDERSTANDING DISTRICT, SCHOOL, AND INDIVIDUAL GOALS
This
is an investigative phase asking you to examine the documents that are intended
to chart the course of improvement in your district and school.
Ed
512.06 Certified Paraeducators.
Requirements for paraeducators certified under Ed
504.05 shall be as follows:
(a)
For those certified paraeducators who are employed
by an agency listed in Ed 512.01, a
minimum
of 50 continuing education units shall be required in areas determined by the
professional development master plan required by this part; and
(b)
For those certified paraeducators who are not
employed by an agency listed in Ed 512.01, a
minimum
of 50 continuing education units of paraprofessional growth shall be required.
The
following diagram summarizes this procedure:
School
Goals Developed
Individual
professional development goals for the staff must be aligned with those of the
District
and/or
those established for the building level. At the end of reviewing guiding
questions you will have identified the critical goals of the district and of the
school. To this end, you should be ready to contribute significantly towards
reaching these goals. To serve as a catalyst for your goal setting process,
questions allow you to gain the most from your professional development
initiative. Change, modify, or add to the list as you find the appropriate
guiding questions that match your professional development effort.
Guiding
Questions for Understanding District, School and Individual Goals
|
Step
1 |
Purpose |
Guiding
Questions |
|
Step
1 |
To
ensure familiarity with
the district’s criteria
for excellence in
teaching and know the
stages of proficiency
for each criterion. |
What
are the district’s criteria for excellence in teaching, and what do
they look like in the day to day activity of classrooms? How
familiar am I with the criteria for excellence, and how confident am I
that I can recognize them in myself and in others? What
distinguishes a competent teacher from an excellent teacher? What
are the best practices suggested by these criteria? What
content knowledge is essential to meet these criteria? |
|
Step
2 |
To
know the district and
school goals for the
improvement. |
What
are the educational goals for this district and school? What
are the signs that these areas need to be the targets for improvement? For
what goals am I particularly responsible and how do I demonstrate
that responsibility now? What
will the improvement look like in this school and district when these
goals are met? |
|
Step
3 |
To
know the student and program targets for improvement. Examine student
work to identify areas for improvement. |
What
student data relates to the improvement goals i.e. meeting GLE/GSE? In
what ways do data from students for whom I am responsible confirm the
need to focus on the selected goals? What
are the implications of these data for me? What
do the goals, data, and work samples tell me I need to do? |
|
Step
4 |
To
develop an individual
profile across
the district’s criteria
to serve as the basis
of discussion and
reflection for the next
phase. |
·What
are my teaching strengths, and are they a part of my “typical” day? What
are the teaching demands that are most difficult for me? How
do I rate myself in relation to the district’s criteria for excellence
in teaching? What
do I need to improve and develop in order to become a more effective
educator in this school and district? |
PHASE
2: Writing Professional Development Goals
The
focus of our Professional Development Master Plan is to increase student
achievement as
evidenced
through the utilization of data. To increase student achievement, two goals are
needed: (1) goals for student learning and (2) goals for teachers. Plans must
address the teacher’s current job assignment.
To
set goals for student learning, teachers must consider the following:
1.
Relationship between knowledge about teaching and learning;
2.
Nature of each discipline as it relates to local, state, and national standards;
and
3.
Analyzing student needs.
Teacher
goals are directly linked to student outcomes. To analyze these outcomes,
teachers must have information such as related data from local, state, and
nationally-normed assessments, student needs, and
teacher performance, as well as available support systems. By the beginning of
October following his/her re-certification year, the staff member meets with
his/her building supervisor to develop a professional growth plan. The
professional growth plan must be completed before any work on the plan can be
approved and completed. This plan is intended to cover a three-year period,
which aligns with the educator’s re-certification
cycle.
Short and long term goals are written and reviewed with the supervisor at the
end of each year to assess the progress and determine if modifications, changes,
or new goals are necessary for the following year. Goals are written reviewed
with the supervisor at the end of each year to assess the progress and determine
if modifications, changes, or new goals are necessary for the following year.
Goals are written on the three-year professional growth plan form.
Guiding
Questions for Writing the Plan
Step 1
|
Developing
the appropriate benchmarks to reach my goals |
How
and when will progress toward my goals be measured along the way? What
kinds of evidence will show the changes I have identified are? important? What
activities offer the best opportunity for successfully meeting my goal? Have
I identified the content, learning, and educational practices I need to
demonstrate? |
Step 2
|
Developing
continuous improvement into my plan |
·
How
and in what ways are the benchmarks I have set leading toward my goals? · Is the action I am taking focused and
organized to bring about results in a reasonable manner? ·
How is the connection to the school and district goals apparent to me
and to others? |
|
Step
3 |
To
improve professional
practice and
knowledge in the priority
area(s). |
In
what ways will I improve my knowledge in the target areas? In
what ways will I improved my skills in the target areas? How
will I share what I will learn that could assist others with a related
goal? How
will I transferred what I have learned to my every day practice? |
|
Step
4 |
To
collect data to reflect on improvement and growth |
What
type of data should I gather to allow me to evaluate my progress? |
Teacher
Competencies
As required by Ed 512, the master plan provides
professional growth opportunities for veteran and new teachers by offering
several different options for earning CEUs. These
opportunities range from independent study to job embedded activities, as well
as in-house and outside presentations, to create a wide range of professional
development activities. These activities offer experiences for educators and
paraprofessionals to gain expertise in the areas of planning and preparation,
classroom climate, knowledge of learners and learning, and the school’s role
and organization.
Professional
Development Opportunities
Professional
development is a series of integrated learning experiences. Every staff
development hour (CEU) is
accumulated
through a variety of approaches that combine to form a unique Professional
Development
Master
Plan consistent with an individual’s professional goals.
The professional educator is continuously assessing and evaluating his/her needs
within the educational environment. With this in mind, the professional is able
to constantly evaluate his/her approach within the classroom and within the
school community, directly impacting student achievement.
The
five educational professional development purposes are:
|
Job-Embedded
Professional Development Job-embedded
professional development is learning that occurs as teachers and
administrators engage in their daily work activities and that results
in increased skill and knowledge needed to assist students to reach
high standards. It is the documented professional learning that occurs
in the course of the educator’s work. It often includes educators
sharing what they have learned, reflecting on specific work
experiences to uncover new understanding, and listening to colleagues
share best practices while trying out new programs or planning or
implementing a project. |
Opportunities
for professional growth are considered to be most valuable when they are met
within relative context of a teacher’s or administrator’s
current and/or anticipated position. PD
activities included in individual plans need to:
Job
embedded professional opportunities have been incorporated within the list
below. The following Professional Development Opportunities include, but are not
limited to: (purposes noted in parentheses)
Job-Embedded
Activity
and
High Quality Formal
CEU’s
( 1CEU=1hour) Required
forms
Professional
Development Activities
|
Independent
Study and Immersion in Content Area: the
process of examining one’s own teaching and/or student learning by
engaging in a research project in the classroom. |
Up
to 30 ½
CEU per chapter |
-Reflection
page -End
Product -Grade
Report/Certification of completion -Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals |
|
New
Curriculum Development and Implementation: learning
and using new curriculum for the first time.
|
Up
to 30 as justified by a given product |
-Reflection
page -End
Product -Grade
Report/Certification of completion -Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals |
|
Mentoring:
The
sharing of expertise and time with teachers new to the district.
Working one on one as a mentor with student teachers. |
Up
to 20 for cooperative teachers or those assigned to a mentoring team per
3 year cycle |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Detailed
log of mentoring sessions and verification from supervisor |
|
Study
Groups and Collaborative Discussions: engage
in regular, structured and collaborative interactions concerning topics
identified by the
group. |
Up
to 10 hours per activity |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Detailed
log of meetings -Summary
of presentation -Must
have relation to professional goals |
|
Visitations:
intended
for teachers who want to visit other schools and classrooms to observe a
particular program or teaching technique. |
Up
to 10 hours per year |
-
Pre-approval and Completion of Form B -Written
summary of the observation -Must
have relation to professional goals |
|
Job-Embedded
Activity and High Quality Formal Professional Development Activities |
CEUs
(1 CEU=1 hour) |
Required
Forms |
|
Content
Immersion: to
participate in an intensive experience with an intensive experience with
a mathematician, scientist, writer, etc., in their job setting |
Up
to 30 CEUs per area of certification |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals -A
detailed journal shall be submitted |
|
Examining
Student Work and Student Thinking:
examining student work to understand thinking and learning strategies
when identifying learning needs and the appropriate teaching strategies
to meet needs. |
10
CEUs per cycle |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals -A
detailed journal shall be submitted |
|
Workshops,
Institutes and Seminars:
activities providing educators with opportunities to learn from
facilitators or leaders with specialized expertise as well as from
peers. |
As
per master agreement/professional contract |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals -Agenda
or Certificate of Attendance |
|
Collegial
or Graduate Course Work:
courses provide structured opportunities to learn from facilitators with
specialized expertise |
10-15
CEUs per credit awarded by the college or
university |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals -Course
Description -Grade
Report |
|
Publishing
Related to Education: designed
to provide the educator the opportunity to publish articles that reflect
on teaching and learning and are the results of research or study on a
topic related to the field of certification |
30
CEUs |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals -Published
article or draft must be submitted as an end product |
|
Technology
for Professional Learning: use
of technology to learn content and pedagogy including but not limited to
computers. The acquisition
of skills for various programs that will aid in the delivery of
pertinent information to students and promote higher levels of thinking
and reasoning. |
20
CEU’s |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals -Detailed
log -Documentation
of application and integration into curriculum |
|
Developing
Professional Developers: teachers
or educational leaders increase their own knowledge and skill beyond
what they teach their students and are responsible for preparing others
to use new programs, strategies, ideas, or participate in change. |
3
CEU’s for each new presentation – one
for each hour of a presentation |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals -In-district
workshop form |
|
Committee
Work- constitutes
working on various building and district wide committees. |
10
CEU’s per committee per year |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B or Certificate of Participation in Staff
Development Form -Must
have relation to professional goals -Written
rationale explaining how committee work supports personal or district
goals |
|
Community
Service Related to The Integration of Service Learning:
Duties extend beyond the classroom doors.
Service learning is as important for teachers as for students
when learning about the values of community in which they teach or live. |
15
CEU’s a year |
-Pre-approval
and Completion of Form B -Must
have relation to professional goals and integrated into classroom lesson
objectives -Detailed
log listing dates, location, time spent and type of activity. -Evidence
of how the experience relates to district/building goals. |
The
Professional Development Master Plan recognizes differences among educators. The
14 opportunities listed above allow for an individual’s plan to encompass
activities unique to his/her specific needs for re-certification.
District
Support for Fulfilling Individual Professional Development Plan
In
addition to providing embedded professional development activities, the
Phase
IV: Documenting the Plan: Staff Development Portfolio
An
effective individual Professional Development Master Plan must be created to
strengthen one’s
knowledge
in these three areas critical to good teaching:
a.)
Knowledge of your subject
b.)
Knowledge of how children learn and
c.)
Pedagogical knowledge
Areas
that need to be strengthened can be identified using, but are not limited to,
the following methods:
a.)
Self-awareness, personal reflections
b.)
Administrative observations
c.)
Peer conversations
d.)
Content area specialists
e.)
Student/parent feedback
f.) Results of standardized and non-standardized measures
The
teacher will reflect on the various activities that s/he has participated in
throughout the plan. Reflection
will review the success of the activity as to student achievement success.
The teacher will meet with a building administrator at the beginning of
his/her re-certification cycle to discuss strengths and weaknesses and to
determine the emphasis on the professional growth plan for the
next three years.
Demonstration
of completion of plan
Each
teacher will create and maintain a professional growth binder/portfolio.
Information to be collected
will
include, but not be limited to, the following:
Section
1: Knowledge of Field (30 CEU)
This
component relates to the individual’s command of knowledge related to his/her
primary teaching or service assignment.
·
Transcripts
-
Workshop attendance certificates and a brief summary of the useful outcomes of
the workshop
- Write-up of job-embedded professional developments (teacher
conversations centered around
content area topics)
·
Sample lesson plans
·
Partnerships with experts in field and demonstration of application in the
classroom
·
Curriculum development
·
Demonstration of personal growth in an identified weakness
·
Professional readings/research
·
Mentoring
·
Student/parent feedback
Section
2: Knowledge of Learners and Learning (45 CEUs must
be addressed in the remaining sections- minimum of 15 CEUs
directed toward designated district goal, remaining can address district
initiatives )
This
component relates to the individual’s understanding of the nature of different
types of
learners
and learning. For example: characteristics of the preadolescent, nature of
learning disabilities, problems in coping with parent’s divorce, concept
formulation, right/left brain hemisphere dominance.
·
Transcripts
·
Workshop attendance certificates and a brief summary of the useful outcomes of
the workshop
.
Write-ups of job-embedded professional developments (teacher conversations
centered
around
effective teaching strategies and how children learn)
·
Sample lesson plans
·
Partnerships with experts in field and demonstration of application in the
classroom
·
Curriculum development
·
Demonstration of personal growth in an identified weakness
·
Professional readings/research
·
Mentoring
·
Student/parent feedback
Section 3: Reflection on the work completed as it relates to student
achievement.
Phase
V: Presenting the Plan
At
the end of the re-certification cycle, the teacher and building administrator
will review the contents of
the
binder/portfolio to determine what has been accomplished in the teacher’s
professional growth plan. The educator will also complete a summary of
activities using Form H (Completion of Form A Goals).
A Form H will be completed for both Goals 1 and 2.
See Appendix for Evaluation Summary Form.
Guiding
Questions for Reflection, Presentation and Summarization of the Plan
Step 1
|
Evaluating
the benchmarks leading to meeting
my goals |
Does
the evidence show the changes in student learning as a result of
implementation of new strategies? Are
the student gains sustainable? How do I know Have
I increased sufficiently the content, learning, and educational
practices I need to demonstrate for students to meet GLEs/GSEs? |
|
Step
2 |
Evaluating
improvement of professional practice and
knowledge in the priority
area(s). |
In
what ways have I improved my knowledge in the target areas? In
what ways have I improved my skills in the target areas? How
will I shared what I learned that could assist others with a related
goal? Have
I transferred what I have learned to my every day practice? |
|
Step
3 |
Evaluating
the collection of data to reflect on improvement and growth |
Does
the type of data I gathered allowed me to
evaluate my progress and the progress of my students? |
THE
APPEALS PROCESS
If there is a disagreement between the staff member submitting the evidence and the supervisor, an appeal may be made to the Professional Development Committee. An Appeals Sub-Committee will consist of one principal, one SAU administrator and two teachers appointed by the Staff Development Committee Chairperson. If the staff member disagrees with the decision handed down by the committee, the appeal is sent to the Superintendent of Schools. The superintendent’s decision is final